[Surgical Indications for Diverticulitis in Germany: Are All Operations Justified?]. / Operationsindikation der Sigmadivertikulitis in Deutschland: Sind alle Operationen gerechtfertigt?

INTRODUCTION: Pathological changes of preexisting sigma diverticulosis into a state of sigma diverticulitis are possible. Treatment of sigma diverticulitis accounts for a significant proportion of emergency treatments in clinics. The number of patients treated for sigma diverticulitis has risen steadily in recent years. Although it can be observed that operated cases making 7 % compared with 14 % to all stationary admissions, there is a less marked increase. Nevertheless, the question should be clarified as to how high the proportion of complicated surgical cases is in relation to non-complicated cases. It is important to clarify, in this context, if each operation is justified or whether in some cases there is over-treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All data relating to Germany, were prospectively collected by the treating hospitals using the DRG and evaluated by the Federal Statistical Office. The treatment numbers from Erlangen were prospectively collected from the encrypted DRG and analysed retrospectively by the coding officer. The investigated period lasted from 2005 to 2010. To demonstrate some treatment options, the following possible forms of therapy were examined with reference to the Hansen/Stock classification. RESULTS: In Germany, about 40 % of stationary patients with sigma diverticulitis are treated surgically. It is striking that in about two thirds of all operated patients uncomplicated forms of diverticulitis were present. The remainder consisted of covered or free perforations. For these complicated forms, various treatment approaches have been established. Ultimately, in dependence of timing these are always surgically treated. In the milder forms the general indication for surgery has come into discussion as the recommendation for a surgical approach after the second relapse in the symptom-free interval is being questioned by several groups based on the age of the studies on which the recommendations are based. CONCLUSION: A significant increase in hospital admissions and surgically treated patients is demonstrated. Striking was that a closer analysis of data revealed that mainly non-complicated cases were surgically treated. This should be seen as a clear indication for an over-treatment. Therefore, possibly not all surgeries performed are justified. In the case of complicated forms, in consideration of various treatment paths, surgery is inevitable in most cases.

[Diverticulitis and indication for surgery--are there new data?]. / Operationsindikation bei Divertikulitis--Gibt es neue Daten?

The treatment in acute diverticulitis has undergone a considerable shift from an offensive to a more restrictive and individual indication for surgery. This review of the very recent literature with special regard to long-term observation of conservatively treated patients clearly shows that surgery is not required in any case of a first episode of severe diverticulitis, but should be recommended in high-risk patients under immunosuppression or chronic renal failure. In all other groups of patients the indication for surgery should be weighed on an individual basis after each episode, again aiming for the laparoscopic procedure. A therapeutic algorithm is proposed according to the Hansen-Stock classification.

[Perforation risk and patient age. Risk analysis in acute sigmoid diverticulitis]. / Perforationsrisiko und Patientenalter. Eine Risikoanalyse bei der akuten Sigmadivertikulitis.

INTRODUCTION: It is often postulated that younger patients with acute sigmoid diverticulitis (SD) have an increased risk of perforation which constitutes an indication for early surgery. The aim of this study was to correlate the severity of sigmoid diverticulitis with patient age in order to check the surgical indication in younger patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with acute SD from January 1998 to June 2009 were included. Two age groups were distinguished: group I (GI) ≤40 years in age and group II (GII) >40 years. The perforation risk associated with first episode SD was determined by multivariate analysis. SD was classified according to Hansen and Stock (H/S). RESULTS: In the total cohort of 959 patients, including 86 in GI (8.9%) and 873 in GII (91.1%) 468 had a first episode, with 64 in GI (13.7%) and 404 in GII (86.3%). The proportion of first episodes was 74.4% in GI and 46.3% in GII (p<0.001). The perforation risk did not differ (H/S IIb: 29.7% in GI vs. 29.2% in GII, p=0.938; H/S IIc: 25% in GI vs. 25% in GII, p=1). Treatment regimes were (GI vs. GII) emergency operations 25% vs. 25% (p=1), elective operations 17.2% vs. 10% (p=0.096) and conservative treatment 57.8% vs. 64.9% (p=0.276). CONCLUSION: First episodes of SD were more frequent in younger patients (≤40) and did not involve a higher risk of perforation. The indication for treatment of acute SD should not be based on age but on the severity of inflammation and the individual situation of patients.

Preoperative CT staging in sigmoid diverticulitis--does it correlate with intraoperative and histological findings?

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate whether the computed tomography (CT) reflects the extent of the inflammation in sigmoid diverticulitis (SD) in order to draw conclusions for selecting the appropriate treatment. METHODS: Two hundred four patients who underwent resection for SD from January 2003 to December 2008 were included. The preoperative CT stage was compared with intraoperative and histological findings. Patients were classified into phlegmonous (Hansen-Stock IIa), abscess-forming (HS IIb), and free perforated (HS IIc) forms of SD. Patients with a recurrent type of diverticulitis were excluded. RESULTS: In the phlegmonous type (HS IIa; n = 75), we found a correlation with the preoperative stage in 52% (intraoperative) and 56% (histological), an understaging in 12% (intraoperative) and 11% (histological), and an overstaging in 36% (intraoperative) and 33% (histological). In the abscess-forming type (HS IIb, Hinchey I/II; n = 87), we found conformity in 92% (intraoperative) and 90% (histological), understaging in 3% (intraoperative) and 0% (histological), and overstaging in 5% (intraoperative) and 10% (histological). In the presence of a free perforation (HS IIc, Hinchey III/IV; n = 42), we saw conformity in 100% (intraoperative and histological). The positive predictive value for correctly diagnosing of phlegmonous type (HS IIa), abscess-forming type (HS IIb), and free perforation (HS IIc) by CT was intraoperatively (histologically) 52% (56), 92% (90), and 100% (100), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The CT is one of the most accurate methods for staging in SD. However, in the phlegmonous type (HS IIa), it leads to an overestimation of the findings in every third patient. It must be clarified whether this pronounced low inflammation should really be regarded as a complicated form of SD. In contrast, the abscess-forming (HS IIb) and free perforated (HS IIc) type of complicated SD is very well reflected by CT.